Communicative language teaching
Communicative
language teaching (CLT), or
the communicative approach, is
an approach to language teaching
that emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate
goal of study.
Societal influences
Communicative language teaching rose to
prominence in the 1970s and early 1980s as a result of many disparate
developments in both Europe and the United States.[1]
First, there was an increased demand for language learning, particularly in
Europe. The advent of the European Common Market led to widespread
European migration, and consequently there was a large population of people who
needed to learn a foreign language for work or for personal reasons.[2]
At the same time, children were increasingly able to learn foreign languages in
school. The number of secondary schools offering languages rose worldwide in
the 1960s and 1970s as part of a general trend of curriculum-broadening and
modernization, and foreign-language study ceased to be confined to the elite
academies. In Britain, the introduction of comprehensive schools meant that almost all
children had the opportunity to study foreign languages.[3]
This increased demand put pressure on
educators to change their teaching methods. Traditional methods such as grammar translation assumed that students were
aiming for mastery of the target language, and that students were willing to
study for years before expecting to use the language in real life. However,
these assumptions were challenged by adult learners who were busy with work,
and by schoolchildren who were less academically able. Educators realized that to
motivate these students an approach with a more immediate payoff was necessary.
The trend of progressivism in education
provided a further pressure for educators to change their methods.[3]
Progressivism holds that active learning is more effective than passive
learning,[4]
and as this idea gained traction in schools there was a general shift towards
using techniques where students were more actively involved, such as group
work. Foreign-language education was no exception to this trend, and teachers
sought to find new methods that could better embody this shift in thinking.[3]
Academic influences
The development of communicative language
teaching was also helped by new academic ideas. In Britain, applied linguists
began to doubt the efficacy of situational language
teaching, the dominant method in that country at the time. This was
partly in response to Chomsky’s insights into the nature of language. Chomsky
had shown that the structural theories of language prevalent at the time could
not explain the creativity and variety evident in real communication.[2]
In addition, British applied linguists such as Christopher Candlin and Henry Widdowson
began to see that a focus on structure was also not helping language students.
They saw a need for students to develop communicative skill and functional
competence in addition to mastering language structures.[2]
In the United States, the linguist and
anthropologist Dell Hymes developed the concept of communicative competence. This was a reaction
to Chomsky’s concept of the linguistic competence of an ideal native
speaker.[1]
Communicative competence redefined what it meant to “know” a language; in
addition to speakers having mastery over the structural elements of language,
according to communicative competence they must also be able to use those
structural elements appropriately in different social situations.[1]
This is neatly summed up by Hymes’s statement, “There are rules of use without
which the rules of grammar would be useless.”[3]
Hymes did not make a concrete formulation of communicative competence, but
subsequent authors have tied the concept to language teaching, notably Michael Canale
No comments:
Post a Comment